+1 415 842 4822 mail@channelmeister.com

Doves, Hawks and other animals – The Daily PPILL #42

I have always been fascinated by Game Theory.

I haven’t been able to practice it that much, because -while you would argue that it could be used everywhere- the scenarios in life where it is possible to take a step back and theorize, are few. The theoretical aspects of it are also complicated enough sometimes and make my head spin. But I still love it and I think that understanding game theory can be, if not of immediate advantage, at least a reasoning platform for many daily issues.

This post is longer than my usual daily post, but I did not want to shortchange it. So instead of writing a short post, let’s try this: I wrote a longer post, with a short summary of the idea upfront. Here is the summary:

The mathematician John Maynard Smith conducted a number of thought experiments, simulating them on a computer. In those experiments, he defined different “personalities”, with different aggression profiles. He came up with Doves, Hawks, Bullies, Retaliators and Prober-Retaliators.

What he found in his experiments is that all the “extreme” personalities (either the too aggressive, or the completely submissive), are unstable, meaning that even though circumstances can be forced when one or the other predominates, eventually the situation changes to something else.

But there was only one that resulted in a stable status: when most of the population was a Retaliator. This particular personality is the personification of the “speak softly and carry a big stick” saying. They generally act peacefully and try to resolve differences without violence, that is unless they are attacked. Then they retaliate.

There is a reason why we ended up in the current state of things during and after the cold war.

END OF THE SUMMARY. If you are interested in the details, and perhaps the moral of the story, keep reading.

I am currently listening to the audio version of Richard Dawkin’s “The Selfish Gene”, a book about evolution, and when possible, taking notes on the e-book version. The premise of the book is that genes want to survive and thrive, and everything that happens around them, in their so-called “survival machines” (that includes us), serves that purpose.

But I am not getting into the details of evolution in this article. I just thought that a particular passage of the book can perhaps be of use for all of us in understanding current events, and I offer it in that way. If you please, read through this and draw your own conclusions.

In the book, Dawkins describes a hypothetical experiment drawn up by Maynard Smith. The experiment is described as follows:

“Any individual of our hypothetical population is classified as a Hawk or a Dove. Hawks always fight as hard and as unrestrainedly as they can, retreating only when seriously injured. Doves merely threaten in a dignified conventional way, never hurting anybody. If a hawk fights a dove the dove quickly runs away, and so does not get hurt. If a hawk fights a hawk they go on until one of them is seriously injured or dead. If a dove meets a dove nobody gets hurt; they go on posturing at each other for a long time until one of them tires or decides not to bother any more, and therefore backs down. “

Furthermore, they add a few other “personalities”:

“A more complex strategy is called Retaliator.

A retaliator plays like a dove at the beginning of every fight. If his opponent attacks him, however, he retaliates. In other words, a retaliator behaves like a hawk when he is attacked by a hawk, and like a dove when he meets a dove. When he meets another retaliator he plays like a dove. A retaliator is a conditional strategist.

Another conditional strategist is called Bully.

A bully goes around behaving like a hawk until somebody hits back. Then he immediately runs away.

An yet one more:

“another conditional strategist is Prober-retaliator.

A prober-retaliator is basically like a retaliator, but he occasionally tries a brief experimental escalation of the contest. He persists in this hawk-like behaviour if his opponent does not fight back. If, on the other hand, his opponent does fight back he reverts to conventional threatening like a dove. If he is attacked, he
retaliates just like an ordinary retaliator.”

Are we good? So we got Dove, the pacifist posturer; the Hawk, the one who’s always looking for a fight; the Retaliator, who is usually a good guy, until you cross him; and then the Bully, who is just abusing and threatening everybody until meets someone who’s the real deal and he retreats. The prober-retaliator is almost just like a Retaliator that goes Bully sometimes.

There are three important aspects as well that factor into the experiment, and these are:

  • No individual can tell beforehand -that is, before engaging in a fight- what kind of opponent do they face.
  • No individual can remember previous fights, so fighting an opponent just to uncover them won’t work, because there is no way to use that information again.
  • Finally, as a matter of convenience and simplification, all individuals are equally strong.

Now, when it becomes really interesting is when they put all these in a computer simulator and let it run. Here is what they observe:

“If all the five strategies I have mentioned are turned loose upon one another in a computer simulation, only one of them, retaliator, emerges as evolutionarily stable. Prober-retaliator is nearly stable. Dove is not stable, because a population of doves would be invaded by hawks and bullies. Hawk is not stable, because a population of hawks would be invaded by doves and bullies. Bully is not stable, because a population of bullies would be invaded by hawks. In a population of retaliators, no other strategy would invade, since there is no other strategy that does better than retaliator itself. However, dove does equally well in a population of retaliators. This means that, other things being equal, the numbers of doves could slowly drift upwards.”

So Hawks face a problem. While as an individual, they may be in a good position for survival, as a group, it is a terrible strategy. Remember that “if a hawk fights a hawk they go on until one of them is seriously injured or dead”, so potentially, after having fought all the doves, a population of only Hawks would decrease geometrically, until only one is left.

An interesting and somewhat counterintuitive outcome is the survival of the doves in a population of retaliators. Since all retaliators behave at first like doves in a confrontation, no individual can tell at first whether they are facing a dove or a retaliator. Under this condition, doves can easily disguise themselves.

Obviously, these are very simplified models and they assume that every individual acts on their own behalf, well, individually. There are no alliances. Also, the fact that in reality, some individuals can be way stronger than others, radically changes some of the dynamics.

In any case, for us, and considering the current events, every dove you see out there may be really a retaliator, and a Hawk, may just be a bully.

As originally published at The ChannelMeister
on April 5, 2022. Please consider sharing and subscribing HERE.
The Daily PPILL is my personal daily blog project. PPILL stands for Purpose, Process, Innovation, Leverage, and Leadership; the themes that I write about, and in my view, indispensable ingredients of any great initiative.

Join my mailing list

Sign up to stay in touch with me and you will get the very next update.

Please wait...

Thank you!

You have successfully joined our subscriber list.

Whitelist mail@channelmeister.com and if you are using gmail, move my next email to "Primary" to ensure delivery.

Scaling – The Daily PPILL # 136

"We'll make it up in volume". I am still appalled, almost offended by this response. Especially when someone doesn't truly understand how their business works and makes them money. It is even worse coming from someone who is compensated on revenue, not profit. Many times I also hear how something is scalable. How it can be replicated easily and...

Biting more than you can chew – The Daily PPILL #135

Transforming operations and a supply chain is a difficult task that demands comprehensive organizational changes and strategies that can continue to deliver value. One common mistake that organizations incur onto, is biting off more than they can chew when it comes to transformation. Companies rush into the process without proper planning and...

Same person, two descriptions – The Daily PPILL #134

How do you balance your professional life with your personal life? Do you have true friends? Do spend time with them? Are you there for your family whenever they need you? On the flip side, what are your achievements? Are you respected by your peer group? Not my original by any means. I heard this comparison a few days ago, but I thought it was...

We need an open API for business – The Daily PPILL #133

An API is one of those words that us "tech bros" (can I say "tech sis"?) just throw around mindlessly, with disregard of the huge idea behind it. It stands for "Application Programming Interface' and the formal definition of an API goes as: API n. a set of functions and procedures allowing the creation of applications that access the features or...

Daily Habits – The Daily PPILL #132

Sometimes, committing to do something daily, looks a lot more difficult than perhaps a few days a week. That may be true, but actually following through may be the problem. I'll say it here. I am not really good at going to the gym. Part of it, is that I am obsessed on how I use my time. I mean, I am the type of person that when I am passing the...

This is me (yeah, and that’s you!) – The Daily PPILL #131

My recent milestone of getting to 500 subscribers on LinkedIn got me thinking on something. It was quite humbling, because I never set out to get to it. I am not "humble bragging" here, I swear. One of the things that crossed my mind was, "What have I done to deserve it?" Seriously. Why would someone "waste' their time and attention on me? Easily...

When churn begins to show up – The Daily PPILL # 130

The journey to anything worth getting to is never linear. When climbing a steep mountain, the trail turns into a switchback. On a sailboat, by going in a Zig-Zag, we can sail against the wind. And even though we understand these things, yet we expect things to go always forward, always more; and when there is the slightest setback, we feel...

Resilience in Digital – The Daily PPILL # 129

Digital media has a feature that is almost a paradox. Digital media can be the most fragile way of storing information ever invented. Not just because magnetic media can be erased by a magnetic field, and that bad actors can alter it, but because a perfectly legitimate owner of the data can erase it in less time than it takes to say "oops". What...

Shipping Containers, work, and TCP/UDP? – The Daily PPILL # 128

Some time ago, I was listening to a Fresh Air episode about the global supply chain and while hearing about the extreme complexity of properly orchestrating trans-shipment and to efficiently store each container, it came to mind how this could be used to explain two of the fundamental transport protocols that make the Internet work. If you are in...

The value of sorting – The Daily PPILL # 127

This episode of PPILL brought to you courtesy of the tedious work of assembling IKEA furniture. When everything is commingled together, it takes us longer to find what we are looking for. So we have separated Large and Small eggs so they can be sold with different price points, or we have pre-sorted daily doses of pills, to make sure that all...

How the perspective of something terrible can make us embrace good deeds – The Daily PPILL #126

We've all been there before. We set a goal for ourselves, whether it's to save money, lose weight, or quit smoking; but no matter how badly we want to achieve that goal, we just can't seem to stick to it. That's because we humans are notoriously bad at sticking to our commitments. One of the reasons we don't keep our commitments is because goals...

Between South Florida and Seattle – The Daily PPILL #125

In Miami, the rain is not just a rain, it is the rain of Miami. It is the sound of a thousand drums. It is universal flood level of water. It is as if the sky has opened up and poured out its contents on the city below it. But if you wait, just a few minutes, it will stop. Rarely someone in Miami carries an umbrella, and most resort for the quick...

The Network Effect – The Daily PPILL #124

The Network effect is a term that describes technologies or trends that become more valuable as more people uses them. There are, of course, very recent examples of this like Facebook or Twitter, but there is also sort of a joke going around. Remember the Fax machine? The joke goes that the first person to buy a Fax machine was an idiot, and the...

The rat catcher – The Daily PPILL #123

The most common business ideas revolve in some way around scarcity. They either harness something and maintain its scarcity, which gives it tremendous value, and then sell it for high prices, or they identify something that is scarce, and satisfy that demand. But, How can you make money out of something that is abundant? Maybe even too abundant?...

The map is never followed – The Daily PPILL #122

I have been involved quite a bit lately with mapping Customer Journeys. Just in case you don't know what that is, it is a simple concept: Every customer goes through a number of steps before they purchase something, and this journey sometimes also continues long after the transaction. Most companies have a very rough model for the customer...

The hardest 100 feet – The Daily PPILL #121

If you have ran, or have done any type of exercise, you'll know what I am talking about. The hardest part of a five Km run, are the 100 feet that take you to the door. Once you have made the decision and committed to the point of getting out the door, the rest of the run will come. You may quit midpoint, you will do so wanting to do it better the...

Run towards complexity – The Daily PPILL #120

Digital Transformation is not just about using new technologies in a company's operations, but also about adapting their business model and processes, changing their culture, operating models and management thinking. It is all about removing complexity. And if you are a Digital Transformation agent, you must act as any fearless leader. Just like...

Our own language – The Daily PPILL #119

Belonging. Where is that in the Maslow hierarchy? Oh yeah, it is pretty basic and important, right after safety and just before "Esteem". All of us want to belong to a group. There are even those who belong to the group that doesn't belong to the group. In business, or for instance, in any occupation, discipline, even in sports or a hobby; there...

Antibodies reject the organ – The Daily PPILL #118

I write quite a bit about innovation. The reason is that it really gets me excited, and I believe that innovation is at the center of every great organization, if it wouldn't be for that big idea, that differentiator, there would be no massive value creation. But every organization also builds things their way, and as time passes, it becomes...

Non invertible functions – The Daily PPILL #117

This is quite a nerdy one. One of the things used quite a lot in cryptography, is what are called “non invertible functions”. These are mathematical functions that by operating on something they give you a result, but the inverse function either doesn’t exist, or its output is undefined (meaning that is not unique). Non-invertible functions are...

Look! New running shoes! – The Daily PPILL #116

People are often drawn to buying a new accessory, running shoes, electronics and other things when they feel like they need a change in their life. Buying a new accessory can be a great way to motivate oneself. It can be a good way to celebrate reaching a goal, or it could simply be the next step in an ongoing goal. That's why some people buy new...

Chef Massimo Botura – The Daily PPILL #115

From his Wikipedia page, "Massimo Bottura is an Italian restaurateur and the chef patron of Osteria Francescana, a three-Michelin-star restaurant based in Modena, Italy which has been listed in the top 5 at The World's 50 Best Restaurants Awards since 2010". Wow. Top 50. At Osteria Francescana they insist on surprising you, rather than giving you...

Creative destruction – The Daily PPILL #114

Important transformational work is often tied to doing away with the existing Status Quo. Incremental change, the kind that tweaks and optimizes the existing order, can be done without major upheaval. Adding a feature here, making something better there; that doesn't require to throw away what we had before. This happens both in software,...

The one handed keyboard – The Daily PPILL #113

When I first heard about this, I was really struck. But it made all the sense. There are more than a million people just in the US living without at least one of their hands, and statistics say that this number will grow by 50,000 every year. It is sad and heartbreaking, but it is a fact; so that someone had come up with a way for a person to...

Please, don’t push all the buttons – The Daily PPILL #112

It is really hard, and quite a drag, to go 10, 15 floors up (or down). Two or four flights of stairs, not so much. So if you had the power to design a business building and determine where each of the occupants will reside, Who would you place on the ground floor, first floor, second,... etc.? Would you go with the busiest entity on the ground...
%d bloggers like this: