+1 415 842 4822 mail@channelmeister.com

Doves, Hawks and other animals – The Daily PPILL #42

I have always been fascinated by Game Theory.

I haven’t been able to practice it that much, because -while you would argue that it could be used everywhere- the scenarios in life where it is possible to take a step back and theorize, are few. The theoretical aspects of it are also complicated enough sometimes and make my head spin. But I still love it and I think that understanding game theory can be, if not of immediate advantage, at least a reasoning platform for many daily issues.

This post is longer than my usual daily post, but I did not want to shortchange it. So instead of writing a short post, let’s try this: I wrote a longer post, with a short summary of the idea upfront. Here is the summary:

The mathematician John Maynard Smith conducted a number of thought experiments, simulating them on a computer. In those experiments, he defined different “personalities”, with different aggression profiles. He came up with Doves, Hawks, Bullies, Retaliators and Prober-Retaliators.

What he found in his experiments is that all the “extreme” personalities (either the too aggressive, or the completely submissive), are unstable, meaning that even though circumstances can be forced when one or the other predominates, eventually the situation changes to something else.

But there was only one that resulted in a stable status: when most of the population was a Retaliator. This particular personality is the personification of the “speak softly and carry a big stick” saying. They generally act peacefully and try to resolve differences without violence, that is unless they are attacked. Then they retaliate.

There is a reason why we ended up in the current state of things during and after the cold war.

END OF THE SUMMARY. If you are interested in the details, and perhaps the moral of the story, keep reading.

I am currently listening to the audio version of Richard Dawkin’s “The Selfish Gene”, a book about evolution, and when possible, taking notes on the e-book version. The premise of the book is that genes want to survive and thrive, and everything that happens around them, in their so-called “survival machines” (that includes us), serves that purpose.

But I am not getting into the details of evolution in this article. I just thought that a particular passage of the book can perhaps be of use for all of us in understanding current events, and I offer it in that way. If you please, read through this and draw your own conclusions.

In the book, Dawkins describes a hypothetical experiment drawn up by Maynard Smith. The experiment is described as follows:

“Any individual of our hypothetical population is classified as a Hawk or a Dove. Hawks always fight as hard and as unrestrainedly as they can, retreating only when seriously injured. Doves merely threaten in a dignified conventional way, never hurting anybody. If a hawk fights a dove the dove quickly runs away, and so does not get hurt. If a hawk fights a hawk they go on until one of them is seriously injured or dead. If a dove meets a dove nobody gets hurt; they go on posturing at each other for a long time until one of them tires or decides not to bother any more, and therefore backs down. “

Furthermore, they add a few other “personalities”:

“A more complex strategy is called Retaliator.

A retaliator plays like a dove at the beginning of every fight. If his opponent attacks him, however, he retaliates. In other words, a retaliator behaves like a hawk when he is attacked by a hawk, and like a dove when he meets a dove. When he meets another retaliator he plays like a dove. A retaliator is a conditional strategist.

Another conditional strategist is called Bully.

A bully goes around behaving like a hawk until somebody hits back. Then he immediately runs away.

An yet one more:

“another conditional strategist is Prober-retaliator.

A prober-retaliator is basically like a retaliator, but he occasionally tries a brief experimental escalation of the contest. He persists in this hawk-like behaviour if his opponent does not fight back. If, on the other hand, his opponent does fight back he reverts to conventional threatening like a dove. If he is attacked, he
retaliates just like an ordinary retaliator.”

Are we good? So we got Dove, the pacifist posturer; the Hawk, the one who’s always looking for a fight; the Retaliator, who is usually a good guy, until you cross him; and then the Bully, who is just abusing and threatening everybody until meets someone who’s the real deal and he retreats. The prober-retaliator is almost just like a Retaliator that goes Bully sometimes.

There are three important aspects as well that factor into the experiment, and these are:

  • No individual can tell beforehand -that is, before engaging in a fight- what kind of opponent do they face.
  • No individual can remember previous fights, so fighting an opponent just to uncover them won’t work, because there is no way to use that information again.
  • Finally, as a matter of convenience and simplification, all individuals are equally strong.

Now, when it becomes really interesting is when they put all these in a computer simulator and let it run. Here is what they observe:

“If all the five strategies I have mentioned are turned loose upon one another in a computer simulation, only one of them, retaliator, emerges as evolutionarily stable. Prober-retaliator is nearly stable. Dove is not stable, because a population of doves would be invaded by hawks and bullies. Hawk is not stable, because a population of hawks would be invaded by doves and bullies. Bully is not stable, because a population of bullies would be invaded by hawks. In a population of retaliators, no other strategy would invade, since there is no other strategy that does better than retaliator itself. However, dove does equally well in a population of retaliators. This means that, other things being equal, the numbers of doves could slowly drift upwards.”

So Hawks face a problem. While as an individual, they may be in a good position for survival, as a group, it is a terrible strategy. Remember that “if a hawk fights a hawk they go on until one of them is seriously injured or dead”, so potentially, after having fought all the doves, a population of only Hawks would decrease geometrically, until only one is left.

An interesting and somewhat counterintuitive outcome is the survival of the doves in a population of retaliators. Since all retaliators behave at first like doves in a confrontation, no individual can tell at first whether they are facing a dove or a retaliator. Under this condition, doves can easily disguise themselves.

Obviously, these are very simplified models and they assume that every individual acts on their own behalf, well, individually. There are no alliances. Also, the fact that in reality, some individuals can be way stronger than others, radically changes some of the dynamics.

In any case, for us, and considering the current events, every dove you see out there may be really a retaliator, and a Hawk, may just be a bully.

As originally published at The ChannelMeister
on April 5, 2022. Please consider sharing and subscribing HERE.
The Daily PPILL is my personal daily blog project. PPILL stands for Purpose, Process, Innovation, Leverage, and Leadership; the themes that I write about, and in my view, indispensable ingredients of any great initiative.

Huba Rostonics is a GTM and Business Strategy expert, offering services to Mid-Market, Enterprise, and Start-Ups. To learn more please schedule an exploratory call

Subscribe to The Daily PPILL

Sign up to get the very next Daily PPILL from The Channelmeister

Please wait...

Thank you!

You have successfully joined the subscriber list.

Whitelist mail@channelmeister.com and if you are using gmail, move my next email to "Primary" to ensure delivery.

These three simple things could save your children’s lives – The Daily PPILL #215

We have created a climate mess. We are heading straight to disaster unless we accelerate the world's transition into an economy that is not harmless to our planet. If you believe this, don't loose your hope, here are three things that you can do to pull your weight: REDUCE YOUR USE OF PLASTIC It is hard, but not THAT hard. Start with the plastic...

What HR could learn from the services folks – The Daily PPILL #214

Tech Support organizations added, or changed their titles to “Customer Success”. Those who did it without any cynicism, recognized early that there is much more value when an organization focuses in helping customers reach their goals, than just conforming to a SLA, pursuing a certain “up time”. This thinking has allowed services organizations to...

Three things your iPhone could be better at – The Daily PPILL #213

I wrote a post almost 15 years ago, where I listed a number of features that I wanted on my phone and that, at the time, sounded quite far fetched. I called it "The mobility I want". I remembered this post and I decided to take a look at what I wrote, and compare it to where we stand now. Here are the features I wanted : What I envisioned:What we...

Forcing the decision – The Daily PPILL #212

We most interpret a "solomonic decision" (or solution), as one that is simplistic, and that doesn't really resolve things. Sometimes we even interpret it as one that does not benefit anybody, one that destroys value. The real moral of the story is a very different one, although this last point about destroying value holds true. As Peter Drucker...

The customer is always right – The Daily PPILL #211

Actions speak louder than words. It doesn't matter what our story is, if we don't support it with the way we provide our products or services to our customers. The story will not change the actions, and especially not change what the customer perceives as the outcome. A few days ago I went to pickup my lunch. I did request two sides, and no...

Chose to remember hope to forget – The Daily PPILL #210

We have control of our narrative of appreciation, celebration, but also regret, and resentment. We don't have to go with our gut's feeling, and we can make a decision on what we chose to remember. Forgetting is a little bit harder, as we can chose what we want to forget, but we can only hope that we'll do. By doing so, we chose to have world that...

Thank you! – The Daily PPILL #209

Hello all. Today, tonight, make sure that we appreciate the gifts of life, and that we let our closest ones know how grateful we are for their presence. If you want, do the exercise of looking through the goals you set out for yourself in the beginning of 2022, and see which ones you achieved. Feel the gratitude. Nothing much more matters, I just...

Things you may add to your Thanksgiving gratitude list – The Daily PPILL #208

Hey! It is THAT time of the year when we HAVE to be grateful. It is like we have to drop everything else that we are doing and say thanks for what we have. Overall, it is a good thing. A great thing. We can all be grateful for the things that we have around us and that we take for granted. For one, I am grateful for my good health, and my...

Without Customer Success practices, you’re blind – The Daily PPILL #207

Peter Drucker, in his book, "The Effective Executive" makes the point that is very hard to understand what customers are doing because there is no insight into what goes on inside their walls. Because of this, companies tend to be managed mostly in isolation, occupied by internal issues and projects; when in reality all that can affect the...

It is not all our fault – The Daily PPILL #206

Our go-get-it culture constantly repeats us that we can be anything we want to be. The only thing needed is some focus and lots of hard work. Part of this is absolutely true. We live in times where individuals have a great power over their future, and they can intentionally shape it. At least in the west, we are in a much better place, and skin...

The one thing you should do today – The Daily PPILL #205

Before you do anything else, ask yourself: "What is the one thing that I can (and must) do today to get me closer to my goals?" If you do nothing else, do that one thing. It will be worth more, and you'll feel more satisfied than after a full day of nonsense and busyness.

The woman in the X5 – the Daily PPILL #204

It was one of those busy mornings when we just have to run to get something done. On a quiet street, the side of the road I was traveling on was free, but ahead there was a vehicle parked on the other side of road. I could see an SUV approaching the parked vehicle as I was going to pass it. As it is customary around here, I was expecting the...

Illiterate no more – The Daily PPILL #203

So this may be old news for some of you guys. Especially because we are already at version 16 of iOS, and the previous version, iOS 15, was released in mid 2021. Although, there is a feature that was released with iOS 15 that -at least from my point of view- didn't get enough publicity. I am talking about "Live Text". The reason why I think we...

The flywheel – The Daily PPILL #202

So many models today include this concept, but what is a flywheel? IRL, it is a massive -like with a lot of mass- wheel that keeps turning. Every internal combustion engine has one, where its function is to smooth out the motion originating from the cylinders pushing one at a time. There are other applications where the energy storage of a...

Validation vs. Desire – The Daily PPILL #201

Validation is a great motivator. I know. It is for me. The applause at the end of the performance, the pat in the back. Feeling part of the group, being looked at with admiration, makes me feel proud. But validation by itself cannot be the driver of our lives. It is frail, competing for everybody's attention, and many times it fails to recognize...

Lead or In the Lead? – The Daily PPILL #200

What does it mean to be a leader? As it happens many times in our English language, it is contextual. And I am not referring to contextual, or "situational leadership". I mean that the term "leader" means a completely different thing depending on the context is used in. The most common use, is related to leadership. So a leader is whoever is...

Baby and bathwater – The Daily PPILL #199

We don't want to throw away the baby with the bathwater. Get rid of the soiled, unwanted; keep the precious. This is why most entrepreneurs talk about "the pivot" and not a leap. A leap means lunging into the void, leaving everything behind, with all your energy; and then not knowing for sure where and how we'll land. A pivot is cautious, and is...

Event horizons in history – The Daily PPILL #198

When we look back at history, we rarely think about inventions outside of the context of how they changed things after they appeared and got adopted. A different and interesting way of thinking about it is in reverse. How were things BEFORE their invention? If you have ever read a book or seen a documentary on black holes, you have probably heard...

Pushing the pitch too far – The Daily PPILL #197

Selling customer outcomes instead of just features is a better way to connect with their needs. It will always be a better way to sell the value of a product or a service. But as automobile commercials like to say, "your mileage may vary", and you can share all you want the outcomes that other similar customers have experienced, but for every new...

The last chart of the Internet – The Daily PPILL #196

Well, maybe. I love charts and beautiful and imaginative ways of representing data, and I discovered a new type of chart -at least for me- because of the labor of love of a gentleman called Phineas. You can see how plastic waste is processed HERE, in his appropriately titled blog "Sankey Diagrams". For 15 years he has been posting examples, and...

The uncanny valley – The Daily PPILL #195

The "uncanny valley" is a term first translated in 1978 from professor Masahiro Mori's 'bukimi no tani genshō', and it was first used to refer to human replicas that appear almost, but not exactly, like real human beings and how these elicit feelings of eeriness and revulsion among some observers. It is called a valley, because according to...

Skeuomorphic – The Daily PPILL #194

You know that thing that looks like the old version of it? The "radio" app on your smartphone that looks like an old timer radio, with dial and all? Or the eBook reader that turns pages and has a spine and you can see the edges of all the pages? The calculator app that looks like your HP41C? (HP12, if you are more "modern"). Well, there is a word...

Six no-BS Metaverse use cases – The Daily PPILL #193

I don't think there is a more popular buzzword today than "Metaverse". So if we let other people smarter than me define it, I particularly like Karina Nobbs', which goes like: "a persistent, live digital universe that affords individuals a sense of agency, social presence, and shared spatial awareness, along with the ability to participate in an...

The origin story – The Daily PPILL #192

Every superhero or super villain has an origin story. We understand the heroes we grew up with, because we are familiar with them. But if we were to encounter one of them for the first time, there would be a lot of things that would not make sense and that would raise a lot of questions. What is this thing called krypto-what? why is he so strong?...

Eat my brains out – The Daily PPILL #191 Halloween Edition

Americans, we are suckers for zombie shows and movies. How many more can we have? I have heard that we even make special weapons for those who want to prepare themselves for a zombie apocalypse. (I am not sure which part of that sentence is more wrong). Decomposing, yet almost invincible, half humans the relentlessly hunt us, and that plague our...
%d bloggers like this: