+1 415 842 4822 mail@channelmeister.com

Doves, Hawks and other animals – The Daily PPILL #42

I have always been fascinated by Game Theory.

I haven’t been able to practice it that much, because -while you would argue that it could be used everywhere- the scenarios in life where it is possible to take a step back and theorize, are few. The theoretical aspects of it are also complicated enough sometimes and make my head spin. But I still love it and I think that understanding game theory can be, if not of immediate advantage, at least a reasoning platform for many daily issues.

This post is longer than my usual daily post, but I did not want to shortchange it. So instead of writing a short post, let’s try this: I wrote a longer post, with a short summary of the idea upfront. Here is the summary:

The mathematician John Maynard Smith conducted a number of thought experiments, simulating them on a computer. In those experiments, he defined different “personalities”, with different aggression profiles. He came up with Doves, Hawks, Bullies, Retaliators and Prober-Retaliators.

What he found in his experiments is that all the “extreme” personalities (either the too aggressive, or the completely submissive), are unstable, meaning that even though circumstances can be forced when one or the other predominates, eventually the situation changes to something else.

But there was only one that resulted in a stable status: when most of the population was a Retaliator. This particular personality is the personification of the “speak softly and carry a big stick” saying. They generally act peacefully and try to resolve differences without violence, that is unless they are attacked. Then they retaliate.

There is a reason why we ended up in the current state of things during and after the cold war.

END OF THE SUMMARY. If you are interested in the details, and perhaps the moral of the story, keep reading.

I am currently listening to the audio version of Richard Dawkin’s “The Selfish Gene”, a book about evolution, and when possible, taking notes on the e-book version. The premise of the book is that genes want to survive and thrive, and everything that happens around them, in their so-called “survival machines” (that includes us), serves that purpose.

But I am not getting into the details of evolution in this article. I just thought that a particular passage of the book can perhaps be of use for all of us in understanding current events, and I offer it in that way. If you please, read through this and draw your own conclusions.

In the book, Dawkins describes a hypothetical experiment drawn up by Maynard Smith. The experiment is described as follows:

“Any individual of our hypothetical population is classified as a Hawk or a Dove. Hawks always fight as hard and as unrestrainedly as they can, retreating only when seriously injured. Doves merely threaten in a dignified conventional way, never hurting anybody. If a hawk fights a dove the dove quickly runs away, and so does not get hurt. If a hawk fights a hawk they go on until one of them is seriously injured or dead. If a dove meets a dove nobody gets hurt; they go on posturing at each other for a long time until one of them tires or decides not to bother any more, and therefore backs down. “

Furthermore, they add a few other “personalities”:

“A more complex strategy is called Retaliator.

A retaliator plays like a dove at the beginning of every fight. If his opponent attacks him, however, he retaliates. In other words, a retaliator behaves like a hawk when he is attacked by a hawk, and like a dove when he meets a dove. When he meets another retaliator he plays like a dove. A retaliator is a conditional strategist.

Another conditional strategist is called Bully.

A bully goes around behaving like a hawk until somebody hits back. Then he immediately runs away.

An yet one more:

“another conditional strategist is Prober-retaliator.

A prober-retaliator is basically like a retaliator, but he occasionally tries a brief experimental escalation of the contest. He persists in this hawk-like behaviour if his opponent does not fight back. If, on the other hand, his opponent does fight back he reverts to conventional threatening like a dove. If he is attacked, he
retaliates just like an ordinary retaliator.”

Are we good? So we got Dove, the pacifist posturer; the Hawk, the one who’s always looking for a fight; the Retaliator, who is usually a good guy, until you cross him; and then the Bully, who is just abusing and threatening everybody until meets someone who’s the real deal and he retreats. The prober-retaliator is almost just like a Retaliator that goes Bully sometimes.

There are three important aspects as well that factor into the experiment, and these are:

  • No individual can tell beforehand -that is, before engaging in a fight- what kind of opponent do they face.
  • No individual can remember previous fights, so fighting an opponent just to uncover them won’t work, because there is no way to use that information again.
  • Finally, as a matter of convenience and simplification, all individuals are equally strong.

Now, when it becomes really interesting is when they put all these in a computer simulator and let it run. Here is what they observe:

“If all the five strategies I have mentioned are turned loose upon one another in a computer simulation, only one of them, retaliator, emerges as evolutionarily stable. Prober-retaliator is nearly stable. Dove is not stable, because a population of doves would be invaded by hawks and bullies. Hawk is not stable, because a population of hawks would be invaded by doves and bullies. Bully is not stable, because a population of bullies would be invaded by hawks. In a population of retaliators, no other strategy would invade, since there is no other strategy that does better than retaliator itself. However, dove does equally well in a population of retaliators. This means that, other things being equal, the numbers of doves could slowly drift upwards.”

So Hawks face a problem. While as an individual, they may be in a good position for survival, as a group, it is a terrible strategy. Remember that “if a hawk fights a hawk they go on until one of them is seriously injured or dead”, so potentially, after having fought all the doves, a population of only Hawks would decrease geometrically, until only one is left.

An interesting and somewhat counterintuitive outcome is the survival of the doves in a population of retaliators. Since all retaliators behave at first like doves in a confrontation, no individual can tell at first whether they are facing a dove or a retaliator. Under this condition, doves can easily disguise themselves.

Obviously, these are very simplified models and they assume that every individual acts on their own behalf, well, individually. There are no alliances. Also, the fact that in reality, some individuals can be way stronger than others, radically changes some of the dynamics.

In any case, for us, and considering the current events, every dove you see out there may be really a retaliator, and a Hawk, may just be a bully.

As originally published at The ChannelMeister
on April 5, 2022. Please consider sharing and subscribing HERE.
The Daily PPILL is my personal daily blog project. PPILL stands for Purpose, Process, Innovation, Leverage, and Leadership; the themes that I write about, and in my view, indispensable ingredients of any great initiative.

Huba Rostonics is a GTM and Business Strategy expert, offering services to Mid-Market, Enterprise, and Start-Ups. To learn more please schedule an exploratory call

Subscribe to The Daily PPILL

Sign up to get the very next Daily PPILL from The Channelmeister

Please wait...

Thank you!

You have successfully joined the subscriber list.

Whitelist mail@channelmeister.com and if you are using gmail, move my next email to "Primary" to ensure delivery.

Summertime – The Daily PPILL #375

The first Daily PPILL was published more than 18 months ago. It has been an incredible ride creating the habit of creating daily, and counting with your patronage. I seldom hear from any of you, but every once in a while someone reminds me that there are readers out there and I am infinitely grateful for them. THANK YOU. This summer, I will need...

Determination (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #374

If we don’t have the will, we’ll never get things done. We may never even get started. Hannibal (not the fictional serial killer of “Silence of the Lambs”, but the Carthaginian general), has been recognized as one of the greatest military strategists of all times. Among other things, he famously invaded Italy (and the Roman Republic) during the...

Pulling off the Band-Aid – The Daily PPILL #373

Consulting is an interesting role. We go about our lives being somewhat experts at what we do, and we think that we have all the answers. That's why most of us think that doing the same thing as a consultant will be a piece of cake. Having been on both sides of the table, I am here to tell you that it is, actually, a very different skillset. Most...

Building a vision (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #372

In hindsight, successful startups always have great teams, however, the recruitment process rarely has to do with résumés. Sure, skills are important, but more important is to share a strong vision. A vision that prospective team members can get inspired by and join our journey. This is the underlying idea of something called "the crazy quilt",...

On Tools and Weapons – The Daily PPILL #371

Hungarians, are the descendants from the Huns. "Barbarians", they called them. So what could be more fitting than this thing showing up in one of the drawers in my Hungarian cousin's kitchen? A hatchet, just like AI, can be either a tool in the right hands, or a weapon in the wrong ones.

Decision making – The Daily PPILL #370

The topic that is occupying my mind lately, is the nature of exponentials and how they play into business. I am working on some long form content, which makes it hard to publish my regular Daily PPILL while I also take care of business. But I thought, why not dig up some of my favorite posts? Here is another one: Making the right decision is...

Habits (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #369

The topic that is occupying my mind lately, is the nature of exponentials and how they play into business. I am working on some long form content, which makes it hard to publish my regular Daily PPILL while I also take care of business. But I thought, why not dig up some of my favorite posts? Here is another one: There is an awesome quote by no...

Backward compatibility (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #368

The topic that is occupying my mind lately, is the nature of exponentials and how they play into business. I am working on some long form content, which makes it hard to publish my regular Daily PPILL while I also take care of business. But I thought, why not dig up some of my favorite posts? Here is one: The concept of "backward compatibility"...

The Bullet Journal (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #367

The topic that is occupying my mind lately, is the nature of exponentials and how they play into business. I am working on some long form content, which makes it hard to publish my regular Daily PPILL while I also take care of business. But I thought, why not dig up some of my favorite posts? Here is another one: I. Cannot. Stop. Talking. About....

Saving the world, one email at a time (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #366

The topic that is occupying my mind lately, is the nature of exponentials and how they play into business. I am working on some long form content, which makes it hard to publish my regular Daily PPILL while I also take care of business. But I thought, why not dig up some of my favorite posts? Here is one: There are many wonderful purpose-driven...

Ode to the middle manager – The Daily PPILL #365

As long as there has been organized work, there has been supervisors. The often hated individuals who often make sure that the work is done under spec, and on-time. The ones that are "responsible" for production, for hitting the quota, for making the numbers. Each worker may have their own idea of what to do, how to do it, and when to do it, but...

Momentum, the Unstoppable Force (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #364

In a world where technology is constantly advancing, simple yet ingenious inventions can capture our attention. The humble flywheel, often overlooked, these rotating wonders possess an appeal that inspires me, especially now that I am more and more involved with the creation of Exponential Organizations and the exponential technologies that are...

“Don’t know everything, but I am fast learner” – The Daily PPILL #363

I bet you heard that before. I would even bet that you have uttered it sometime. It speaks to human nature to our energy and interest to figure out things, even if we are not perfect memory machines that can recall any piece of information at will. But how about if I told you that AI seems to behave this way more and more. Here is an anecdote: A...

Finding Purpose (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #362

Finding one's purpose is easy for some. They know already who they want to be, and what they want to do. It hasn't always been so easy for me. I am a fast learner, because of that, I tend to do reasonably well in many things, and since I like variety, change is always exciting to me. Because of this, coming up with a list of things that I would...

The Next Meeting (Repost) – The Daily PPILL #361

Doing a good job gets you the next one, and just like that, the purpose of every meeting should be at least to get the next one. The therapist always books the next session right away and we always talk about the next one at the end of a date. Every meeting with a customer is an opportunity to discover something where they can use more help....

Hypecycle – The Daily PPILL #360

If you have anything to do with technology, you are most likely familiar with the "hypecycle" and how technologies, when being introduced at first are not taken into account, but as they start to get traction, and people get excited, they are usually overhyped. Most of the time this creates a gap between people's expectations and what the...

16000 trips – The Daily PPILL #359

Most stuff we use wear out as we do. Every single time we do our thing, we leave a little bit of it in what we made. The soles of our shoes wear thinner, the edge of our knife gets dull. But some things get better every time we use them. I rode with an Uber driver the other day who had 16,000 trips. You can be dang sure that this gentleman has...

Reverse Hitchhiking – The Daily PPILL #358

I'll start today with an anecdote. When I went to college for my undergraduate in Electronics Engineering, few of us had cars, especially because in the town I went to school, most people were admitted to college before they hit the legal age for driving. Buses were a pain in the you-know-what, and they ran few and far in-between. Many of us...

“Your call is important to us” – The Daily PPILL #357

No wonder why younger generations prefer to text or just use an app. We still have to call-in every once in a while, and when we do, we get the "...your call is important to us...please stay on the line..." on loop. Even we hear this, we know is not true. How do we know? Been waiting too long The deck is stacked against us: If no one answers, our...

‘lectric – The Daily PPILL #356

To me it is pretty clear, but there are still sources that try to make it look like the environmental impact of an electric vehicle is higher than one equipped with an internal combustion engine. Here are a couple of graphics that show the data, you may argue that the data is skewed, but you can be the judge. First, there is the consumption, a...

Embrace the imperfection of models to make better decisions – The Daily PPILL #355

Just to make sure we know what we are talking about, I am referring to a "model" that attempts to mimic somehow the behavior of a system, market, customer, etc. No smoking hot individuals here. Every model is fundamentally wrong. It is a feature of every model. Models start with something as simple as a "rule of thumb" and, through time, they can...

Drummers and platforms – The Daily PPILL #354

What's the purpose of platforms? With so much talk these days around the responsibility of Social Media companies in what their members say or do not say, it is worth looking at what is meant with platforms and what's their reason for existing. I used to play the drums, quite a lot. And drummers know a few things about platforms. They give us the...

The masculinity of gardening – The Daily PPILL #353

Are we still in the celebrity CEO era? I think we are. I believe I heard someone calling its end, but the market never got the message. We continue to laud -sometimes even worship- the energetic visionary, and even despotic fearless leader in front of some of the companies that are the protagonists of our changing world. In our mind, they may be...

Encryption and truth – The Daily PPILL #352

The simplest way to understand encryption, is to think of a decoder wheel. One character becomes another, so the output on the other side of the function becomes garbled and cannot be read, unless we have our own wheel. Modern encryption though, is some more complex than that, because simple decoder wheels can be broken fairly easily, and you...

Absolute and relative – The Daily PPILL #351

What matters? Is it the actual number? Or is it compared to something? As many times, the answer is, "depends". When we are trying to determine if we reached a goal, if we "made it", we have to go with the absolute number. "Black or white", "night or day"; it has to be clear as that. If we have succeeded on our quarterly goals, we either made the...
%d bloggers like this: